Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [HACKERS] Partitioning vs ON CONFLICT - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Langote
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Partitioning vs ON CONFLICT
Date
Msg-id 80a4672e-fddf-ceff-d53c-59322ac6fbea@lab.ntt.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Partitioning vs ON CONFLICT  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Responses Re: Partitioning vs ON CONFLICT  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On 2017/03/10 9:10, Amit Langote wrote:
> On 2017/03/09 23:25, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 1:47 AM, Amit Langote wrote:
>>> I updated the patch.  Now it's reduced to simply removing the check in
>>> transformInsertStmt() that prevented using *any* ON CONFLICT on
>>> partitioned tables at all.
>>
>> This patch no longer applies.
> 
> Rebased patch is attached.

Oops, really attached this time,

Thanks,
Amit

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jeff Janes
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Teach Catalog.pm how many attributes thereshould be per DATA() line
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] contrib modules and relkind check