Re: Partitioning vs ON CONFLICT - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Partitioning vs ON CONFLICT
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmoY2G7NgkCSafQ32hLaA77zbK9g3c6MPfsGr=Czhw1bivA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Partitioning vs ON CONFLICT  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Responses Re: Partitioning vs ON CONFLICT  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 7:20 PM, Amit Langote
<Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> On 2017/03/10 9:10, Amit Langote wrote:
>> On 2017/03/09 23:25, Robert Haas wrote:
>>> On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 1:47 AM, Amit Langote wrote:
>>>> I updated the patch.  Now it's reduced to simply removing the check in
>>>> transformInsertStmt() that prevented using *any* ON CONFLICT on
>>>> partitioned tables at all.
>>>
>>> This patch no longer applies.
>>
>> Rebased patch is attached.
>
> Oops, really attached this time,

Committed with a bit of wordsmithing of the documentation.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: rename pg_log directory?
Next
From: Andreas Karlsson
Date:
Subject: Re: rename pg_log directory?