Re: [HACKERS] Partitioning vs ON CONFLICT - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Langote
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Partitioning vs ON CONFLICT
Date
Msg-id 959ff87c-a207-846a-cccb-f5723d7cca58@lab.ntt.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Partitioning vs ON CONFLICT  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Partitioning vs ON CONFLICT  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2017/03/09 23:25, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 1:47 AM, Amit Langote wrote:
>> I updated the patch.  Now it's reduced to simply removing the check in
>> transformInsertStmt() that prevented using *any* ON CONFLICT on
>> partitioned tables at all.
> 
> This patch no longer applies.

Rebased patch is attached.

Thanks,
Amit





pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] contrib modules and relkind check
Next
From: Jeff Janes
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Teach Catalog.pm how many attributes thereshould be per DATA() line