> On 11 May 2023, at 06:24, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 01:06:42PM +1000, Peter Smith wrote:
>> While reviewing another patch to the file info.c, I noticed there seem
>> to be some unnecessary calls to strlen(query) in get_rel_infos()
>> function.
>>
>> i.e. The query is explicitly initialized to an empty string
>> immediately prior, so why the strlen?
>
> It just looks like this was copied from a surrounding area like
> get_db_infos(). Keeping the code as it is is no big deal, either, but
> yes we could just remove them and save the two calls. So ok by me.
I think it's intentionally done in 73b9952e82 as defensive coding, and given
that this is far from a hot codepath I think leaving them is better.
Instead I think it would be more worthwhile to remove these snprintf() made
queries and use PQExpbuffers. 29aeda6e4e6 introduced that in pg_upgrade and it
is more in line with how we build queries in other tools.
Looking at the snprintf sites made me remember a patchset I worked on last year
(but I don't remember if I ended up submitting); there is no need to build one
of the queries on the stack as it has no variables. The attached 0003 (which
needs a reindent of the query text) comes from that patchset. I think we
should do this regardless.
--
Daniel Gustafsson
