Re: Postgres performance comments from a MySQL user - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Postgres performance comments from a MySQL user
Date
Msg-id 8063.1055809534@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Postgres performance comments from a MySQL user  (Ernest E Vogelsinger <ernest@vogelsinger.at>)
Responses Re: Postgres performance comments from a MySQL user  (Ernest E Vogelsinger <ernest@vogelsinger.at>)
Re: Postgres performance comments from a MySQL user  (Kaarel <kaarel@future.ee>)
List pgsql-general
Ernest E Vogelsinger <ernest@vogelsinger.at> writes:
> At 02:04 17.06.2003, Tom Lane said:
>> It's really hard to believe that you could see that kind of ratio from
>> any sort of cache effects, even kernel disk buffer cache which is
>> normally pretty large.

> I have EXPLAIN ANALYZE VERBOSE available.

That's the 3-sec-vs-10-msec case though.  I can easily believe that that
represents kernel disk caching effects --- that is, 3 sec is what it
really takes to read all the data from disk, but once it's in RAM you
can do the calculations in 10 msec.  The number that got my attention
was 20 minutes.  I don't see where that could come from, given the same
query plan and no change in other system load.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Sven Köhler
Date:
Subject: Re: RE : full featured alter table?
Next
From: Ernest E Vogelsinger
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgres performance comments from a MySQL user