On 5/23/19 11:57 PM, Julie Nishimura wrote:
> Hello,
> We have an issue with fsm_relations utilization reaching 99%, I was able
How are you arriving at the above percentage?
How many tables/indexes do you have in the database(s)?
> to vacuum a handful of tables, but it wasn't enough to make a noticeable
> difference. I think at this point we will need to increase the number of
> fsm_relations from 80,000 to 100,000 which will require a restart.
> Because there aren't any more dead rows to delete. I confirmed this by
> connecting to each db and running the following query:
> SELECT relname, n_live_tup, n_dead_tup from pg_stat_user_tables order by
> n_dead_tup desc
> daily_mail_shared_state_cddt_3588-
> relname | n_live_tup | n_dead_tup
> ----------------+------------+------------
> article_errors | 0 | 0
> article_names | 3375193 | 0
> indexdefs | 0 | 0
> tabledefs | 0 | 0
>
> Above output, shows n_dead_tup is zeroed out, this makes me believe that
> we need to increase the number of fsm relations to a number between 90k
> and 100k.But I might be wrong, need your advice.
>
> PostgreSQL 8.2.15 (Greenplum Database 4.3.8.1 build 1)
>
> Thanks!
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
