Re: Indexed views? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tiago Wright
Subject Re: Indexed views?
Date
Msg-id 7ece122a040907165222ee08a@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Indexed views?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Indexed views?  (Doug McNaught <doug@mcnaught.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
> > where productname is in the product table, and lotname in the lot
> > table. I would be interested in creating an index such as
> 
> > CREATE INDEX ix_vw_lot ON vw_lot (lotname, productname);
> 
> What purpose would this serve that indexes on the separate tables
> wouldn't serve?
> 
> > The index would be enough to cover 90% of the queries against
> > lot the lot and inventory tables.
> 
> This sounds to me like you are suffering from a common misconception.
> Postgres cannot answer queries from the contents of indexes alone.

Yes, thanks Tom. This is precisely what I was missing. I searched the
archives for the reason why this is so, but I found only one message
mentioning the MVCC mechanism. Can you point me in the right
direction? I would like to understand the issue.

IMHO, a change in this area could deliver great performance improvements.

-Tiago


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Gaetano Mendola
Date:
Subject: Re: Why does pg_stat_activity Truncate Queries?
Next
From: Stephan Szabo
Date:
Subject: Re: Making AFTER triggers act properly in PL functions