On 2020-12-11 21:27, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> By the way-- What did you think of the idea of explictly marking the
> types used for bitmasks using types bits32 and friends, instead of plain
> int, which is harder to spot?
If we want to make it clearer, why not turn the thing into a struct, as
in the attached patch, and avoid the bit fiddling altogether.
