Re: [PATCH] minor bugfix for pg_basebackup (9.6 ~ ) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Ian Barwick
Subject Re: [PATCH] minor bugfix for pg_basebackup (9.6 ~ )
Date
Msg-id 7e92c294-f8fd-bd83-447d-8839c96fb9ea@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] minor bugfix for pg_basebackup (9.6 ~ )  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 7/27/19 6:52 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2019-Jul-25, Michael Paquier wrote:
> 
>> On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 11:23:30AM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>>> Heh, yesterday I revised the original patch as attached and was about to
>>> push when the bell rang.  I like this one because it keeps the comment
>>> to one line and it mentions the function name in charge of the
>>> validation (useful for grepping later on).  It's a bit laconic because
>>> of the long function name and the desire to keep it to one line, but it
>>> seems sufficient to me.
>>
>> Looks fine to me.  A nit: addition of braces for the if block.  Even
>> if that a one-liner, there is a comment so I think that this makes the
>> code more readable.
> 
> Yeah, I had removed those on purpose, but that was probably inconsistent
> with my own reviews of others' patches.  I pushed it with them.

Thanks

Regards

Ian Barwick


-- 
  Ian Barwick                   https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
  PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: partition routing layering in nodeModifyTable.c
Next
From: Craig Ringer
Date:
Subject: Re: concerns around pg_lsn