On 05/12/2018 15:47, Rene Romero Benavides wrote:
> Also read about hot updates and the storage parameter named
> "fill_factor", so, data blocks can be recycled instead of creating new
> ones if the updated fields don't update also indexes.
I have read about these, but I'd prefer not to be making
opportunistic/guessing changes on this.
How can I collect metrics/logging/etc evidence to confirm what the
problem actually is?
cheers,
Chris
