Re: [PATCH 4/4] Add tests to dblink covering use of COPY TO FUNCTION - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Daniel Farina
Subject Re: [PATCH 4/4] Add tests to dblink covering use of COPY TO FUNCTION
Date
Msg-id 7b97c5a40911291853j1388346cv4051a98404c9d5ef@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH 4/4] Add tests to dblink covering use of COPY TO FUNCTION  (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>)
Responses Re: [PATCH 4/4] Add tests to dblink covering use of COPY TO FUNCTION
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 6:35 PM, Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> wrote:
> What if the network buffer is flushed in the middle of a line? Is that
> possible, or is there a guard against that somewhere?

What do you mean?  They both catenate onto one stream of bytes, it
shouldn't matter where the flush boundaries are...

It so happens as a convenient property of the textual modes is that
adding more payload is purely concatenative (not true for binary,
where there's a header that would cause confusion to the receiving
side)

fdr


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jeff Davis
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] Add tests to dblink covering use of COPY TO FUNCTION
Next
From: Itagaki Takahiro
Date:
Subject: Re: draft RFC: concept for partial, wal-based replication