On 19.12.23 07:23, Richard Guo wrote:
> By chance I discovered that the comment for the typedefs of "double"s
> does not cover Cardinality. Should we update that comment accordingly,
> maybe something like below?
>
> - * Typedefs for identifying qualifier selectivities and plan costs as such.
> - * These are just plain "double"s, but declaring a variable as Selectivity
> - * or Cost makes the intent more obvious.
> + * Typedefs for identifying qualifier selectivities, plan costs and
> + * estimated rows or other count as such. These are just plain "double"s,
> + * but declaring a variable as Selectivity, Cost or Cardinality makes the
> + * intent more obvious.
Fixed, thanks.
