Re: Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] plperl and regexps with accented characters - incompatible? - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Greg Sabino Mullane
Subject Re: Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] plperl and regexps with accented characters - incompatible?
Date
Msg-id 7b2485d524ff843ebedaf9efb51398ea@biglumber.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] plperl and regexps with accented characters - incompatible?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-patches
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160


Tom Lane reports:

>> The version I tested against is 5.8.8 -  the latest stable release. The
>> 5.8 series started in 2003 from what I can see - if anyone has a
>> sufficiently old system that they can test on 5.6.2 that will be useful.

> I got around to trying it with a dusty 5.6.1 I have laying about on my
> HPPA machine, and the news is not good: CREATE LANGUAGE plperl dumps
> core deep inside libperl.  With or without this patch.

Sounds like another good reason to start enforcing a minimum modern Perl
version. In the past, I advocated making it a minimum of 5.6, but now I
think a minimum of 5.8 is in order. The first version of 5.8 was released
in July of 2002, so I don't think we'd be upsetting very many people if
we did so. Plus, they'd be potentially dumping core anyway, and our energy
is better spent improving Pl/Perl itself at this point rather than tweaking
things for old versions of Perl. I don't even think I have a pre 5.8
version around anymore. Would such a requirement cause any problems with
packagers? I imagine a perl 5.8 prereq is a common thing these days...


- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200712011322
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iD8DBQFHUaaevJuQZxSWSsgRA44LAJ9N47I0bIjjILxkOAAUv1ud0lDPAACdEX1J
b3oIV+o0OPrT+RNW03WsGxg=
=0I4i
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] plperl and regexps with accented characters - incompatible?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] plperl and regexps with accented characters - incompatible?