Re: [BUGS] BUG #14706: Dependencies not recorded properly for basetypes - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Heikki Linnakangas
Subject Re: [BUGS] BUG #14706: Dependencies not recorded properly for basetypes
Date
Msg-id 7b174b7a-4c94-f785-5c92-70bfc3a6d1db@iki.fi
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [BUGS] BUG #14706: Dependencies not recorded properly for base types  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [BUGS] BUG #14706: Dependencies not recorded properly for base types  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Re: [BUGS] BUG #14706: Dependencies not recorded properly for base types  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-bugs
On 06/15/2017 04:02 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> The business with "opaque" as a placeholder has been deprecated for
> circa 15 years; did you find that example in any modern
> documentation?

I wonder if we should remove the support for this, in master. It's been 
deprecated for long enough that no-one should miss it when it's gone. 
Would be one less hack to maintain.

- Heikki



-- 
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #14706: Dependencies not recorded properly for base types
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #14706: Dependencies not recorded properly for base types