Re: [BUGS] BUG #14706: Dependencies not recorded properly for base types - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: [BUGS] BUG #14706: Dependencies not recorded properly for base types
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqTc-7u1k2vZ3qLxvSyaXbvNCrc9zMuvyF4-wUzJ8zFKVg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [BUGS] BUG #14706: Dependencies not recorded properly for basetypes  (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>)
List pgsql-bugs
On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 2:59 PM, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> wrote:
> On 06/15/2017 04:02 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>
>> The business with "opaque" as a placeholder has been deprecated for
>> circa 15 years; did you find that example in any modern
>> documentation?
>
>
> I wonder if we should remove the support for this, in master. It's been
> deprecated for long enough that no-one should miss it when it's gone. Would
> be one less hack to maintain.

Yeah, the idea has crossed my mind. And do that as well for PLs and triggers.
-- 
Michael


-- 
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #14706: Dependencies not recorded properly for base types
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #14706: Dependencies not recorded properly for base types