Re: [BUGS] BUG #14706: Dependencies not recorded properly for base types - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [BUGS] BUG #14706: Dependencies not recorded properly for base types
Date
Msg-id 29134.1497532835@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [BUGS] BUG #14706: Dependencies not recorded properly for basetypes  (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>)
List pgsql-bugs
Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> writes:
> On 06/15/2017 04:02 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> The business with "opaque" as a placeholder has been deprecated for
>> circa 15 years; did you find that example in any modern
>> documentation?

> I wonder if we should remove the support for this, in master. It's been 
> deprecated for long enough that no-one should miss it when it's gone. 
> Would be one less hack to maintain.

I thought about that too, but I think it's a bit late for v10.
Wouldn't object to doing it in the v11 cycle.  In the meantime,
we'd need a fix for the back branches anyway.
        regards, tom lane


-- 
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: ruchitat@planittesting.com
Date:
Subject: [BUGS] BUG #14708: Frequent connection timeout issue while connecting toPostgres database
Next
From: Anthony Sotolongo
Date:
Subject: Re: [BUGS] Regarding copy of function from one db to another db