Re: [HACKERS] Logical replication and inheritance - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Logical replication and inheritance
Date
Msg-id 7a3e1b5e-05c7-b612-9907-6a328a6e81d7@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Logical replication and inheritance  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Logical replication and inheritance  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 4/16/17 23:00, Amit Langote wrote:
>> To fix this, pg_dump should emit ADD TABLE ONLY foo.
> 
> Yeah, that's one way.  Attached is a tiny patch for that.
> 
> By the way, I noticed that although grammar accepts ONLY and * against a
> table name to affect whether descendant tables are included, the same is
> not mentioned in the CREATE PUBLICATION and ALTER PUBLICATION reference
> pages.  I suspect it was probably not intentional, so attached a doc patch
> for that too.

Committed those, with some extra tests.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Maksim Milyutin
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table
Next
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] some review comments on logical rep code