On 06/11/2018 04:01 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 6/11/18 15:38, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>>>> On 5 Jun 2018, at 16:31, Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>>>>> The patch contains a simple script to run the checks. The code that finds perl files is put in a function in a
singlefile that is sourced by the three locations that need it.
>>>> +1 on centralizing the find-files function.
>>> +1 on that. Why do we need to make the new find_perl_files file
>>> executable, given it's always sourced? (I would have given a .sh
>>> extension because it's a lib not an executable, but I suppose that's
>>> just matter of taste; we certainly don't have a policy about it).
>>>
>>> Looks fine to me either way.
>>>
>>
>> I've committed this, but I'm fine if people want to tweak the names. It
>> probably doesn't need to be executable.
> Why is this being committed after feature freeze?
>
This affects pretty much nothing. In fact some of the other changes I've
recently committed were arguably more dangerous. Do you want me to
revert the whole lot?
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
