Re: Is autovacuum too noisy about orphan temp tables? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Decibel!
Subject Re: Is autovacuum too noisy about orphan temp tables?
Date
Msg-id 7F91BC0B-95CA-4417-811A-6D4BC3188748@decibel.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Is autovacuum too noisy about orphan temp tables?  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: Is autovacuum too noisy about orphan temp tables?
List pgsql-hackers
On Oct 14, 2008, at 4:04 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@oss.ntt.co.jp> writes:
>
>>> Standard DBAs are blind to LOG level messages.
>>
>> Indeed, which is why I'm not too concerned about Heikki's complaint.
>
> Well, if the disk fills up due to excessive LOG entries, they won't be
> so blind.  I think just adding the HINT is good enough.


Since this is something that's not supposed to happen, making it a  
WARNING might be appropriate too...
-- 
Decibel!, aka Jim C. Nasby, Database Architect  decibel@decibel.org
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Decibel!
Date:
Subject: Re: contrib/pg_stat_statements
Next
From: Decibel!
Date:
Subject: Re: How is random_page_cost=4 ok?