-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
- --On Tuesday, July 31, 2007 20:00:38 +0200 Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
wrote:
> Josh Berkus wrote:
>> Right, and that's made more complex if the main users aren't clear on
>> where the machine is.
>
> You have certainly heard of the world wide web, where you can easily
> publish fabulous lists of information in easily accessible form.
Have to agree with Peter on this one ... not necessarily with as much sarcasm,
of course ... that one is a weak argument ...
> If you can find someone to host everything, great, but you have in fact
> already rejected two machines because they are not at the right
> location, when I can see great use for those machines no matter where
> they are.
Have to agree here as well ... sounds like you are looking for utopia where we
generally live in a world of limbo ...
>> I also think you're arguing for the sake of arguing; you don't do
>> performance testing and AFAIK are not planning to host any of the
>> machines.
>
> I think you are wrong.
And on this one, I definitely agree, but for different reasons ... there is
nobody on this list that a) can provide hosting for this or b) you would host
with ... and those that will/would do the performance testing don't care in the
least if the servers are in California or Timbuktoo ... so if you didn't want
discussion on this, why bother posting it here ... ?
- ----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFGr4MX4QvfyHIvDvMRAl2HAJ9j6q6/1sOSunVlcnfp3v9RXkXpxACgs11/
jRZ3UmiROthE4/+0EjREw0k=
=VbZm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
