Re: Support for NSS as a libpq TLS backend - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

> On 29 Oct 2021, at 06:31, Kevin Burke <kevin@burke.dev> wrote:

Thanks for testing the patch!

> I believe that these patches need to integrate the refactoring in commit
> b3b4d8e68ae83f432f43f035c7eb481ef93e1583 - git is searching for the wrong text
> in the existing file


Correct, b3b4d8e68 as well as b4c4a00ea both created conflicts with this
patchset.  Attached is an updated patchset fixing both of those as well as
adding version checks for NSS and NSPR to autoconf (with fallbacks for
non-{nss|nspr}-config systems).  The versions picked are semi-arbitrary and
definitely up for discussion.  I chose them mainly as they were the oldest
commonly available packages I found, and they satisfy the requirements we have.

> I'm not sure how to submit a patch against a patch.

If you've done the work of fixing the conflicts in a rebase, the best option is
IMO to supply a whole new version of the patchset since that will make the CF
patch tester be able to build and test the version.

--
Daniel Gustafsson        https://vmware.com/