Re: Hash Joins vs. Bloom Filters / take 2 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: Hash Joins vs. Bloom Filters / take 2
Date
Msg-id 797A939A-BA84-46DE-8AF6-7BC79E90A46B@anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Hash Joins vs. Bloom Filters / take 2  (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Hash Joins vs. Bloom Filters / take 2  (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers

On March 1, 2018 3:22:44 PM PST, Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>
>
>On 03/01/2018 11:01 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 2018-02-20 22:23:54 +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>>> So I've decided to revive the old patch, rebase it to current
>master,
>>> and see if we can resolve the issues that killed it in 2016.
>>
>> There seems to be some good discussion in the thread. But the patch
>> arrived just before the last commitfest and certainly isn't a trivial
>> cleanup patch. Therefore I think it should be moved to the next CF?
>>
>
>It isn't a massive invasive patch either, though, so I object to moving
>it to 2018-09 right away.

Why do we have rules around not submitting large stuff to the last cf, if we just not follow through? We're neck deep
inpatches that are older. And you've already gotten a fair bit of feedback.. 


Andres

Andres
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: Hash Joins vs. Bloom Filters / take 2
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [patch] BUG #15005: ANALYZE can make pg_class.reltuples inaccurate.