On Mon, May 9, 2022, at 3:47 AM, Amit Kapila wrote:
Thanks. The patch LGTM. I'll push and back-patch this after the
current minor release is done unless there are more comments related
to this work.
Looks sane to me. (I only tested the HEAD version)
+ bool end_xact = ctx->end_xact;
Do you really need a new variable here? It has the same name and the new one
isn't changed during the execution.
Does this issue deserve a test? A small wal_receiver_timeout. Although, I'm not
sure how stable the test will be.
