Re: PostgreSQL <-> Babelfish integration - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Finnerty, Jim
Subject Re: PostgreSQL <-> Babelfish integration
Date
Msg-id 78C248AF-3064-4522-B21F-8DB2DDA09BB1@amazon.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PostgreSQL <-> Babelfish integration  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
Responses Re: PostgreSQL <-> Babelfish integration  (Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
We are applying the Babelfish commits to the REL_12_STABLE branch now, and the plan is to merge them into the
REL_13_STABLEand master branch ASAP after that.  There should be a publicly downloadable git repository before very
long.

On 2/12/21, 2:35 PM, "Peter Geoghegan" <pg@bowt.ie> wrote:

    CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you
canconfirm the sender and know the content is safe.
 



    On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 11:13 AM Matthias van de Meent
    <boekewurm+postgres@gmail.com> wrote:
    > I agree. I believe that Babelfish's efforts can be compared with the
    > zedstore and zheap efforts: they require work in core before they can
    > be integrated or added as an extension that could replace the normal
    > heap tableam, and while core is being prepared we can discover what
    > can and cannot be prepared in core for this new feature.

    I see what you mean, but even that seems generous to me, since, as I
    said, we don't have any Babelfish code to evaluate today. Whereas
    Zedstore and zheap can actually be downloaded and tested.

    --
    Peter Geoghegan




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Seamus Abshere"
Date:
Subject: Re: A reloption for partitioned tables - parallel_workers
Next
From: Laurenz Albe
Date:
Subject: Re: A reloption for partitioned tables - parallel_workers