Re: pg_dump problem - Mailing list pgsql-general

From SHARMILA JOTHIRAJAH
Subject Re: pg_dump problem
Date
Msg-id 787442.58997.qm@web31103.mail.mud.yahoo.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to pg_dump problem  (SHARMILA JOTHIRAJAH <sharmi_jo@yahoo.com>)
List pgsql-general
You are right. There are no rows in pg_class with oids 670739 and 670741. Is that the problem? How do I fix that. Will deleting those rows from pg_depend fix this problem?
Also I have another question. Should the pg tables (like pg_class etc) generally be vacuumed regularly?
Thanks
sharmila

----- Original Message ----
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: SHARMILA JOTHIRAJAH <sharmi_jo@yahoo.com>
Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2007 3:33:20 PM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] pg_dump problem

SHARMILA JOTHIRAJAH <sharmi_jo@yahoo.com> writes:
> looks like the OIDs are there....

Yeah, that makes it look more like the pg_class row went missing
than that there was an intentional drop of the view.

Does "VACUUM VERBOSE pg_class" report anything interesting?
It's possible also that reindexing pg_class would fix it.

            regards, tom lane



Be a better sports nut! Let your teams follow you with Yahoo Mobile. Try it now.

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: stripping HTML, SQL injections ...
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Variable LIMIT and OFFSET in SELECTs