Re: Open items - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Open items
Date
Msg-id 7740.1119792560@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Open items  (Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>)
Responses Re: Open items
List pgsql-hackers
Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> writes:
> On Saturday 25 June 2005 23:24, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> Here are the open items.  Feature freeze is Friday, July 1.

> Where does the rest of the "contrib roundup" fit into this picture?

I think that moving rtree_gist, reindexdb, and/or userlock into core
would have to happen before feature freeze, but the other items
remaining on the to-do list are simply removal of modules, and as such
not bound by feature freeze.  Besides, we've always been laxer about the
rules for contrib than for the core system.

> On a somewhat relative note, I was looking at fulltextindex earlier
> this week, and had thoughts to move it to pgfoundry along with some
> documentation from techdocs. However after discussing with ChrisKL, we
> both seem to reach a conclusion that really that is deprecated code
> and should be deprecated in favor of tsearch2. That being the case
> does anyone think we should still move it?

It's certainly deprecated in favor of tsearch2 as far as the actual
functionality goes.  I think that Josh had suggested preserving it
on pgfoundry more as an example of a nontrivial trigger function.
I wouldn't cry if we just dropped it though.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Fundamental error in "no WAL log" index/file creation stuff
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Fundamental error in "no WAL log" index/file creation