Re: BUG #1290: Default value and ALTER...TYPE - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: BUG #1290: Default value and ALTER...TYPE
Date
Msg-id 7718.1098295649@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to BUG #1290: Default value and ALTER...TYPE  ("PostgreSQL Bugs List" <pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] BUG #1290: Default value and ALTER...TYPE
Re: [HACKERS] BUG #1290: Default value and ALTER...TYPE
List pgsql-bugs
"PostgreSQL Bugs List" <pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org> writes:
> troels=# create table lookat_feature(
> troels(#   feature_id char(4),
> troels(#   status varchar(2) default 'TODO'
> troels(# );
> CREATE TABLE
> troels=# alter table lookat_feature
> troels-#   alter column status type varchar(4);
> ALTER TABLE
> troels=# insert into lookat_feature (feature_id) values('B034');
> ERROR:  value too long for type character varying(2)

Hmm.  What's going on here is that the stored default expression is
actually of the form('TODO'::varchar)::varchar(2)
where you don't see the coercion to varchar(2) in \d becayuse ruleutils.c
doesn't show implicit casts.  After the ALTER COLUMN it's of the form(('TODO'::varchar)::varchar(2))::varchar(4)
which of course will give an error when used.

Possibly we should make ALTER COLUMN strip any implicit coercions that
appear at the top level of the default expression before it adds on the
implicit coercion to the new column datatype.  I am not sure that this
is a good idea, however; it seems like it might alter the semantics in
unexpected ways.  (The default expression could potentially come through
differently than an actually stored value of the column would do.)

The alternative would seem to be decreeing that this is not a bug.

Comments anyone?
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: "PostgreSQL Bugs List"
Date:
Subject: BUG #1290: Default value and ALTER...TYPE
Next
From: Rod Taylor
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] BUG #1290: Default value and ALTER...TYPE