Re: Streaming replication and postmaster signaling - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Streaming replication and postmaster signaling
Date
Msg-id 7705.1262890817@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Streaming replication and postmaster signaling  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Streaming replication and postmaster signaling  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Re: Streaming replication and postmaster signaling  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Re: Streaming replication and postmaster signaling  (Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> That may well be so, but adding another one is not going to improve
> the situation even a little bit.  I don't think what you're saying
> weakens in the slightest the argument that I was making, namely, that
> if this isn't committed RSN it should be postponed to 8.6.  Do you
> disagree?

Well, the argument to my mind is about a suitable value of "RSN".
I think you were stating that we should bounce SR if it's not committed
before the final commitfest starts (ie, next week).  I think we can give
it more slack than that.  Maybe the end of the fest (where the length of
the fest is determined by the other open patches)?
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: Hot Standy introduced problem with query cancel behavior
Next
From: Jeff Davis
Date:
Subject: Re: Listen / Notify - what to do when the queue is full