Re: Postgres performance comments from a MySQL user - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Postgres performance comments from a MySQL user
Date
Msg-id 7704.1055806526@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Postgres performance comments from a MySQL user  (Arjen van der Meijden <acm@tweakers.net>)
Responses Re: Postgres performance comments from a MySQL user
List pgsql-general
Arjen van der Meijden <acm@tweakers.net> writes:
> Well, then there is not. It would still be nice, however, to know why
> queries are faster the second time they're run, even if there is a 100%
> cachehit for the first running query.

Well, there are non-plan caches involved --- specifically the catalog
cache and relation cache.  The first query issued against a given table
in a session will incur the cost to load the cache entries needed, and
the first few queries in a session incur quite a few cache loads to suck
in basic information like pg_operator and pg_proc entries for common
functions and operators.

For example, on my machine with the regression database, the time for
    explain select * from tenk1 where unique1 = 42;
drops from ~18ms first time to ~5ms subsequent times.  AFAICS the only
thing that could cause that difference is catcache/relcache loading.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Arjen van der Meijden
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgres performance comments from a MySQL user
Next
From: Ernest E Vogelsinger
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgres performance comments from a MySQL user