Re:Re: Is Backgroundworker.bgw_restart_time is defined in seconds? - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From constzl
Subject Re:Re: Is Backgroundworker.bgw_restart_time is defined in seconds?
Date
Msg-id 760bcace.361d.17b819ab339.Coremail.const_sunny@126.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Is Backgroundworker.bgw_restart_time is defined in seconds?  (Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>)
List pgsql-bugs
Yes, I got it wrong. You're right. Thank you for your explanation!<br/><br/>Best Regards,
At 2021-08-26 16:09:36, "Daniel Gustafsson" <daniel@yesql.se> wrote:
>> On 26 Aug 2021, at 09:38, constzl <const_sunny@126.com> wrote:
>
>>     if ((worker->bgw_restart_time < 0 &&
>>          worker->bgw_restart_time != BGW_NEVER_RESTART) ||
>>         (worker->bgw_restart_time > USECS_PER_DAY / 1000))
>> 
>> > The Backgroundworker.bgw_restart_time is defined in seconds,
>> > so should it be "USECS_PER_DAY / 1000,000" here instead of "USECS_PER_DAY / 1000"?
>> > Or am I getting it wrong?
>
>bgw_restart_time is defined as "It can be any positive value” in the docs, see:
>
>    https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/bgworker.html
>
>My reading of the above code is that is tries to catch nonsensical values, not
>to cap it to enforce restarts within a 24h period.
>
>--
>Daniel Gustafsson        https://vmware.com/
>
>

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Daniel Gustafsson
Date:
Subject: Re: Is Backgroundworker.bgw_restart_time is defined in seconds?
Next
From: "David G. Johnston"
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #17157: authorizaiton of dict_int and bloom extention