Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk> writes:
> "Tom" == Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
> Tom> ... I find that quite an unacceptable answer. We need to resolve
> Tom> the symlink correctly, or we risk malfunctioning later, for the
> Tom> reasons recited in the comment for find_my_exec().
> On systems with openat(), would it not be possible to resolve symlinks
> without ever needing chdir?
Um ... AFAICS, openat() just opens a file, it doesn't give back a
resolved path. Did you mean readlinkat()?
In any case, we'd still need to support logic that doesn't rely on
non-portable functions. The (vague) idea I had was to try a little harder
to build absolute paths for ourselves instead of letting the system do it.
I believe for instance that canonicalize_path() has more smarts now about
shortening paths like /foo/bar/baz/../../quux than it did when these
functions were written, so we might be able to rely on just concatenating
paths and then canonicalizing the result. (OTOH, I think there are
filesystems where this wouldn't necessarily yield a nice answer, due to
multiple mounts and suchlike.)
regards, tom lane
