Re: Since '2001-09-09 01:46:40'::timestamp microseconds are lost when extracting epoch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Since '2001-09-09 01:46:40'::timestamp microseconds are lost when extracting epoch
Date
Msg-id 7594008a-5f47-ae29-3122-42d13228fd9e@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Since '2001-09-09 01:46:40'::timestamp microseconds are lost when extracting epoch  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 01.04.21 20:49, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> also done
> 
> I also figured out a way to combine the float8 and numeric 
> implementations so that there is not so much duplication.  Added tests 
> to cover all the edge and overflow cases.
> 
> I think this is solid now.
> 
> The extract(julian from timestamp) is still a bit in the slow mode, but 
> as I previously stated, it's not documented and gives the wrong result, 
> so it's not clear whether it should be fixed and what it should do.  I 
> think I'll register that part as an open item in any case, to see what 
> we should do about that.

committed and done




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Rohit Bhogate
Date:
Subject: Reference Leak with type
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Replication slot stats misgivings