Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch
Date
Msg-id 7572.1281118399@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch  ("David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> Why wouldn't we just pass two text arrays to this function and be done
> with it?

That would work too, although I think it might be a bit harder to use
than one alternating-name-and-value array, at least in some scenarios.
You'd have to be careful that you got the values in the same order in
both arrays, which'd be easy to botch.

There might be other use-cases where two separate arrays are easier
to use, but I'm not seeing one offhand.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jaime Casanova
Date:
Subject: Re: including backend ID in relpath of temp rels - updated patch
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: including backend ID in relpath of temp rels - updated patch