Phuong Ma <pma@commandprompt.com> writes:
> I read this from the 7.1 documentation:
> 3.2. Monetary Type
> The money type may become a locale-aware
> layer over the numeric type in a future release.
> The money type stores U.S.-style currency with fixed decimal point
> representation. If Postgres is compiled with locale support then the
> money type uses locale-specific output formatting.
> ----------
> Why does this first say that the money type may become locale-aware in a
> FUTURE release, then the next paragraph says that the money type USES
> locale specific output formatting. So which one is it?
In that sentence, "locale-aware" is an adjective modifying "layer".
It does not say that the current implementation is not locale-aware;
it says that it's not based on numeric.
> Why would it
> be better to use numeric or decimal rather than money data type?
Overflow.
regards, tom lane
