On 08/31/2016 02:38 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> writes:
>> Now that we are OK with static inline functions, we can save some cycles
>> from floating-point functions, by turning Float4GetDatum,
>> Float8GetDatum, and DatumGetFloat8 into static inlines.
>
> Looks good to me.
Ok, will push.
> I wonder whether there is a compiler-dependent way of avoiding the union
> trick ... or maybe gcc is already smart enough that it doesn't matter?
It seems to compile into a single instruction, so it can't get any
better from a performance point of view.
float8pl:
.LFB79:.loc 1 871 0.cfi_startproc
.LVL297:
.LBB959:
.LBB960:.loc 2 733 0movsd 40(%rdi), %xmm2
.LBE960:
.LBE959:
.LBB961:
.LBB962:movsd 32(%rdi), %xmm1
...
A union is probably what language pedantics would prefer anyway, and
anything else would be more of a trick.
- Heikki
