Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 8:57 AM, Peter Eisentraut
> <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> - Maybe add a check to opr_sanity to make sure the default set of
>> functions is configured the way we want?
> That seems like a good idea.
+1 for that. We could adopt the strategy already used in opr_sanity of
searching for functions having an unexpected combination of these
attributes. If there are any legitimate exceptions, they could be
embedded in the expected output.
I concur that changing the behavior of CREATE FUNCTION seems a bit too
cute.
regards, tom lane
