Re: pgsql: Make archiver process an auxiliary process. - Mailing list pgsql-committers

From Fujii Masao
Subject Re: pgsql: Make archiver process an auxiliary process.
Date
Msg-id 743dda39-ab93-eca5-65e9-1e6eb33f1668@oss.nttdata.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pgsql: Make archiver process an auxiliary process.  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>)
Responses Re: pgsql: Make archiver process an auxiliary process.  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-committers

On 2021/06/16 13:29, Fujii Masao wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2021/06/12 19:36, Thomas Munro wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 5:14 PM Fujii Masao <fujii@postgresql.org> wrote:
>>> Make archiver process an auxiliary process.
>>>
>>> This commit changes WAL archiver process so that it's treated as
>>> an auxiliary process and can use shared memory. This is an infrastructure
>>> patch required for upcoming shared-memory based stats collector patch
>>> series. These patch series basically need any processes including archiver
>>> that can report the statistics to access to shared memory. Since this patch
>>> itself is useful to simplify the code and when users monitor the status of
>>> archiver, it's committed separately in advance.
>>
>> I think this needs to handle ProcSignalBarrierPending.  Otherwise,
>> code that tries to use proc signal barriers (like CF #2962 and #2602)
>> might hang forever when an archiver is running.
> 
> Thanks for the comment! I will investigate this.

Attached patch changes archiver so that it also handles barrier events.

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION

Attachment

pgsql-committers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: pgsql: Fix subtransaction test for Python 3.10
Next
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: pgsql: Make archiver process an auxiliary process.