> On 8 Apr 2025, at 18:41, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> wrote:
> I noticed that the third argument of pg_get_process_memory_contexts() is named
> "retries" in pg_proc.dat, while the documentation refers to it as "timeout".
I've committed this patch as it was obviously correct, thanks!
> Also, as I mentioned earlier, I encountered an issue when calling
> pg_get_process_memory_contexts() on the PID of a backend that had just
> encountered an error but hadn't finished rolling back. It led to
> the following situation:
I reconfirmed that the bugfix that Rahila shared in [0] fixes this issue (and
will fix others like it, as it's not related to this patch in particular but is
a bug in DSM attaching). My plan is to take that for a more thorough review
and test tomorrow and see how far it can be safely backpatched. Thanks for
bringing this up, sorry about it getting a bit lost among all the emails.
--
Daniel Gustafsson
[0] CAH2L28shr0j3JE5V3CXDFmDH-agTSnh2V8pR23X0UhRMbDQD9Q@mail.gmail.com
