"David E. Wheeler" <david@justatheory.com> writes:
> I�m doing some development with the new JSON type (actually, Andrew�s backport to 9.1) and needed to do some very
basicequivalence testing. So I created a custom operator:
> CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION json_eq(
> json,
> json
> ) RETURNS BOOLEAN LANGUAGE SQL STRICT IMMUTABLE AS $$
> SELECT $1::text = $2::text;
> $$;
> CREATE OPERATOR = (
> LEFTARG = json,
> RIGHTARG = json,
> PROCEDURE = json_eq
> );
> With this in place, these work:
> SELECT '{}'::json = '{}'::json;
> SELECT ROW('{}'::json) = ROW('{}'::json);
> However this does not:
> create type ajson AS (a json);
> SELECT ROW('{}'::json)::ajson = ROW('{}'::json)::ajson;
> That last line emits an error:
> ERROR: could not identify an equality operator for type json
> To which my response was: WTF?
You have not told the system that your operator is equality for the
datatype. It's just a random operator that happens to be named "=".
We try to avoid depending on operator names as cues to semantics.
You need to incorporate it into a default hash or btree opclass before
the composite-type logic will accept it as the thing to use for
comparing that column.
regards, tom lane
