On 8/12/24 13:44, Alena Rybakina wrote:
> Hi! I think your work is important)
>
I agree, and I'm grateful someone picked up the original patch. I'll try
to help to keep it moving forward. If the thread gets stuck, feel free
to ping me to take a look.
> I started reviewing it and want to suggest some changes to better code:
> I think we should consider the case where the expression is not neither
> an OpExpr and VarOpVar expression.
>
Do you have some specific type of clauses in mind? Most of the extended
statistics only really handles this type of clauses, so I'm not sure
it's feasible to extend that - at least not in this patch.
> Have you tested this code with any benchmarks?
>
FWIW I think we need to test two things - that it (a) improves the
estimates and (b) does not have significant overhead.
regards
--
Tomas Vondra
