Re: Bug plperl.c - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Mark Murawski
Subject Re: Bug plperl.c
Date
Msg-id 73ce9f5a-c11d-2626-199b-8b9dde1d432e@intellasoft.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Bug plperl.c  (Mark Murawski <markm-lists@intellasoft.net>)
Responses Re: Bug plperl.c  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-bugs
HI Tom,

Were you able to reproduce using the updated example?

Thanks.



On 2/22/22 15:27, Mark Murawski wrote:
> Hi Tom
>
> Here you go:
>
> CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION public.foo()
>  RETURNS text
>  LANGUAGE plperlu
> AS $function$
>
> use warnings;
> use strict;
>
> use lib '/tmp';
> use foo;
>
> my @a;
> my @a;
>
> $function$
>
>
> ---
> /tmp/foo.pm
> ---
>
> package foo;
>
> use Data::Dumper;
>
> $SIG{'__WARN__'} = sub {
>    my $pid = main::spi_exec_query('SELECT pg_backend_pid()')->{rows};
>   main::elog(main::NOTICE, 'Warning:' . Dumper(\@_));
>   main::elog(main::NOTICE, 'foo: ' . $pid);
> };
>
> 1;
>
>
>
>
> On 2/22/22 15:06, Mark Murawski wrote:
>> Hi Tom,
>>
>> Wow that was fast!
>>
>> Upon further testing, my path isn't a full fix... there's other parts 
>> of the flow that needs current_call_data
>>
>>
>> I trimmed down my example from the guts of a complex application. 
>> Sorry I didn't re-test with the trimmed example. But the use-case is 
>> very much the same... it has to do with running spi_exec_query during 
>> parse time.
>>
>> I'll work on redoing the example to reproduce the crash.
>>
>>
>>
>> On 2/22/22 14:48, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Mark Murawski <markm-lists@intellasoft.net> writes:
>>>> Affects Versions: 12 (and probably all others)
>>>> Steps to Reproduce:
>>>> - Run a query during plperl validation -- ie: inside a warn handler
>>>> 2022-02-22 12:17:04 EST -  -  -  - 12950 -  - 0 - LOG: server process
>>>> (PID 19702) was terminated by signal 11: Segmentation fault
>>> I couldn't reproduce this, either in HEAD or 12.10.  However, maybe
>>> there's something faulty about your example, because in my hands it
>>> doesn't seem that plperl_spi_exec is reached at all.
>>>
>>> If we do need to do something here, my inclination would be to
>>> reject execution of any SPI operations during validation. That's
>>> not a case that's supposed to have any side-effects.
>>>
>>>             regards, tom lane
>>
>




pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: "egashira.yusuke@fujitsu.com"
Date:
Subject: RE: Reconnect a single connection used by multiple threads in embedded SQL in C application causes error.
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Bug plperl.c