Re: Crash and core on 10.1 and 10.2 - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Crash and core on 10.1 and 10.2
Date
Msg-id 7369.1520528405@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Crash and core on 10.1 and 10.2  (Kelly Burkhart <kelly.burkhart@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Crash and core on 10.1 and 10.2  (Kelly Burkhart <kelly.burkhart@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
Kelly Burkhart <kelly.burkhart@gmail.com> writes:
> Hello, I've had two core dumps in the last couple of weeks.  The most
> recent, yesterday was on version 10.2:

> (gdb) bt
> #0  0x00007f317a043886 in get_next_seq () from /lib64/libc.so.6
> #1  0x00007f317a044acc in strcoll_l () from /lib64/libc.so.6
> #2  0x00000000007ced5f in varstrfastcmp_locale ()
> #3  0x000000000081b6fb in qsort_ssup ()
> #4  0x000000000081d8e1 in tuplesort_performsort ()

Hm.  If you'd just showed this one, my thoughts might bend towards a bug
in our sort abbreviation logic, which is relatively new ...

> (gdb) bt
> #0  0x00007f6e1f09d8ea in get_next_seq () from /lib64/libc.so.6
> #1  0x00007f6e1f09eacc in strcoll_l () from /lib64/libc.so.6
> #2  0x00000000007cf70b in varstr_cmp ()
> #3  0x000000000075f25b in compareJsonbContainers ()
> #4  0x000000000075d8f2 in jsonb_eq ()

... but this stack trace is not going anywhere near that code.  The
common factor is just strcoll_l(), raising the possibility that you're
dealing with a glibc bug, or perhaps corrupted locale data on your
machine.  Are you up-to-date on glibc patches?

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Kelly Burkhart
Date:
Subject: Crash and core on 10.1 and 10.2
Next
From: Alexandru Lazarev
Date:
Subject: Re: What is the meaning of pg_restore output?