Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: We are not following the spec for HAVING without GR - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bort, Paul
Subject Re: We are not following the spec for HAVING without GR
Date
Msg-id 735D404BD9E7EB44B9CDFC27FC88809B0582DAB4@mail2.tmwsystems.com
Whole thread Raw
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
<p><font size="2">> Would those of you with access to other DBMSes try this:</font><p><font
size="2"><snip></font><br/><p><font size="2">Results for "Microsoft SQL Server  2000 - 8.00.944 (Intel
X86)":</font><p><fontsize="2">            </font><br /><font size="2">----------- </font><p><font size="2">(0 row(s)
affected)</font><p><fontsize="2">            </font><br /><font size="2">----------- </font><br /><font
size="2">1</font><p><fontsize="2">(1 row(s) affected)</font><br /><p><font size="2">(1 row(s) affected)</font><br
/><p><fontsize="2">(1 row(s) affected)</font><p><font size="2">            </font><br /><font size="2">-----------
</font><p><fontsize="2">(0 row(s) affected)</font><p><font size="2">            </font><br /><font size="2">-----------
</font><br/><font size="2">1</font><p><font size="2">(1 row(s) affected)</font><p><font size="2">So it looks like MS is
followingthe standard.</font>

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Ioannis Theoharis
Date:
Subject: Raw size
Next
From: "Bort, Paul"
Date:
Subject: Re: Raw size