On 2017-01-11 13:24, Amit Langote wrote:
> There's a bug and has been reported on the -hackers mailing list as
> well. Please try your example after applying the patch 0002 attached
> with the following email:
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/01bc4745-bac8-a033-96a1-8a42b45d2fc1%40lab.ntt.co.jp
Ok, that is good!
I tested the patch as is, but it did not make a difference. Then I read
the patch more carefully.
+ /*
+ * FIXME: We don't engage the bulk-insert mode for partitioned tables,
+ * because the the heap relation is most likely change from one row to
+ * next due to tuple-routing.
+ */
+ if (cstate->rel->rd_rel->relkind == RELKIND_PARTITIONED_TABLE)
+ bistate = GetBulkInsertState();
The if-statement does not match how I read the comment. That is,
shouldn't it be "!=" rather than "=="?
I have tested using that change and now I get the results I expect.
/Ragnar Ouchterlony, Agama Technologies
--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs