Re: Lisp as a procedural language? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From John DeSoi
Subject Re: Lisp as a procedural language?
Date
Msg-id 73060FDE-80FF-4C58-93BD-156B6D191756@pgedit.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Lisp as a procedural language?  ("Joshua Tolley" <eggyknap@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Oct 20, 2008, at 3:00 PM, Joshua Tolley wrote:

> One of the Java-as-a-procedural-language options uses RMI to get the
> server talking to a separate JVM, where the actual function processing
> gets done. Could a PL/Lisp work similarly (and would it be anything
> approaching a good idea...)?

I think it could work, but it is hard to say how good an idea it would  
be without being more familiar with the implementation details on what  
it takes to create a complete procedural language.

There might be some useful ideas from SLIME (http://common-lisp.net/project/slime/ 
) which connects to many different Lisp implementations to provide a  
Lisp IDE in Emacs.

BTW, this is Lisp's 50th birthday being celebrated today at OOPSLA.

http://www.lisp50.org/


John DeSoi, Ph.D.






pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Lawrence, Ramon"
Date:
Subject: Proposed Patch to Improve Performance of Multi-Batch Hash Join for Skewed Data Sets
Next
From: Paul Schlie
Date:
Subject: Re: Block-level CRC checks