Re: Question: test "aggregates" failed in 32-bit machine - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jonathan S. Katz
Subject Re: Question: test "aggregates" failed in 32-bit machine
Date
Msg-id 72f2bcf5-e173-e1d0-5606-2a43d2d3c9ca@postgresql.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Question: test "aggregates" failed in 32-bit machine  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Question: test "aggregates" failed in 32-bit machine  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 10/1/22 3:13 PM, Tom Lane wrote:

> I'm still of the opinion that we need to revert this code for now.

[RMT hat, but speaking just for me] reading through Tom's analysis, this 
seems to be the safest path forward. I have a few questions to better 
understand:

1. How invasive would the revert be?
2. Are the other user-visible items that would be impacted?
3. Is there an option of disabling the feature by default viable?

Thanks,

Jonathan


Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: interrupted tap tests leave postgres instances around
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: longfin and tamandua aren't too happy but I'm not sure why