On 10/1/22 3:13 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> I'm still of the opinion that we need to revert this code for now.
[RMT hat, but speaking just for me] reading through Tom's analysis, this
seems to be the safest path forward. I have a few questions to better
understand:
1. How invasive would the revert be?
2. Are the other user-visible items that would be impacted?
3. Is there an option of disabling the feature by default viable?
Thanks,
Jonathan