Re: non-ipv6 vs hostnames - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From
Subject Re: non-ipv6 vs hostnames
Date
Msg-id 72AE4C5076364440BADFFCCB0A60785B08F651AC@MX02A.corp.emc.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: non-ipv6 vs hostnames  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: non-ipv6 vs hostnames
List pgsql-hackers
> On tis, 2011-08-16 at 16:17 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > Well, I got this on a win64 build. It's *supposed* to have ipv6. I
> > wonder if it breaks on windows just because there is no ipv6 address
> > on the machine...
> 
> It would mean that getaddrinfo() of "::1" failed.  That seems weird.
> 

A system admin can set registry keys to disable IPv6, either partially (allowing ::1), or totally (all IPv6 addresses
fail).

If the system has IPv6 enabled, it's not possible for there to be no ipv6 address.  There is always the link-local
addressof each LAN adapter.
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: plpython crash
Next
From: "David E. Wheeler"
Date:
Subject: Re: PL/Perl Returned Array