Re: pg_dump vs. TRANSFORMs - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: pg_dump vs. TRANSFORMs
Date
Msg-id 729.1481151371@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_dump vs. TRANSFORMs  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
Responses Re: pg_dump vs. TRANSFORMs
List pgsql-hackers
Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> writes:
> As pointed out by Peter E, this also impacts CASTs.  Attached is a patch
> which addresses both by simply also pulling any functions which are
> referenced from pg_cast or pg_transform when they have OIDs at or after
> FirstNormalObjectId.  I also modified dumpCast() and dumpTransform() to
> complain loudly if they're unable to dump out the cast or transform due
> to not finding the function definition(s) necessary.

Please do not hack the already-overcomplicated query in getFuncs without
bothering to adjust the long comment that describes what it's doing.

I have a vague feeling that the code for dumping casts and/or transforms
may have some assumptions that the underlying function is also being
dumped.  Although maybe the assumption was really only what's fixed here,
ie that there be a DumpableObject for the function.  Anyway, take a close
look for that.

Looks reasonable otherwise.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Back-patch use of unnamed POSIX semaphores for Linux?
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: varlena beyond 1GB and matrix