Re: [HACKERS] Packages: Again - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Packages: Again
Date
Msg-id 7279b7b5-0fbe-81cd-2a40-ef0f6f143433@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Packages: Again  (Craig Ringer <craig.ringer@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Packages: Again  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 01/12/2017 03:35 PM, Craig Ringer wrote:
>

>
> So far that's all "that'd be nice, but isn't a technical barrier" stuff.
>
> Package variables for example. When _do_ you _need_ them? For what? (I'm
> aware of some uses but "when you need them" helps us not at all).
>

Well my answer would be, "because we want Oracle people to have an easy 
time migrating". I know that isn't the -hackers answer but clearly there 
is a demand for them. I would note that EDB Advanced server supports 
them, exactly because there is a demand for them.

Again, I am not making the technical argument here. I don't have the 
time to research it. I am making a usability argument for a potentially 
huge portion of database users to allow PostgreSQL to be more attractive 
to them, argument.

I also received this today:

"""
Well, packages make programming much easier. Not only do you keep 
related procedures together, you can also have private package variables 
and the package initialization. Also, packages are units of security, so 
you can grant permissions on the package to the entire group of users 
and if you later modify the package and add a function, you don't need 
to grant it separately.
"""

Sincerely,

JD



-- 
Command Prompt, Inc.                  http://the.postgres.company/                        +1-503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you are honest with them.
Unless otherwise stated, opinions are my own.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Proposal for changes to recovery.conf API
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade vs. pg_ctl stop -m fast