Re: SET LOCAL ROLE NO RESET -- sandbox transactions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Chapman Flack
Subject Re: SET LOCAL ROLE NO RESET -- sandbox transactions
Date
Msg-id 725a459b-e343-2c2e-8196-0e6f60e565d6@anastigmatix.net
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: SET LOCAL ROLE NO RESET -- sandbox transactions
List pgsql-hackers
On 3/27/19 2:40 AM, Eric Hanson wrote:

> What would be the implications of adding a NO RESET clause to SET LOCAL
> ROLE?

There's a part of this that seems to be a special case of the
GUC-protected-by-cookie idea discussed a bit in [1] and [2]
(which is still an idea that I like).

Regards,
-Chap

[1]
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/59127E4E.8090705%40anastigmatix.net

[2]
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA%2BTgmoYOz%2BZmOteahrduJCc8RT8GEgC6PNXLwRzJPObmHGaurg%40mail.gmail.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Banck
Date:
Subject: Re: Progress reporting for pg_verify_checksums
Next
From: Chapman Flack
Date:
Subject: Re: Fix XML handling with DOCTYPE